Search for: "United States v. Common" Results 341 - 360 of 15,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Christine Corcos
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
  For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
What they did have in common was a goal: to keep President-elect Lincoln from the White House. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes:   The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation In a House of Commons debate on the Government’s plan to scrap the last element of the Leveson reform scheme left on the statute books, Labour members voted for an amendment aimed at preventing the complete repeal of section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The business judgment rule is a critical feature of the law governing corporations throughout the United States. [read post]