Search for: "United States v. Hatch"
Results 341 - 360
of 426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
Steven V. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:56 pm
Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961); United Mine Workers v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm
United States, narrowly construing the “waters of the United States” protected by the Clean Water Act.) [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
And with 2024 (September 24th) being the 40th anniversary of the enactment of the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Amendments—the statute that amended Title 35 of the United States Code to create PTEs for certain FDA-regulated products—and a recent spate of PTE-related items posted on regulations.gov, we thought we would peruse some decisions to see what’s up at the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) PTE-wise. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Only until their corporate clients find out (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Discussion of The Hill op-ed by Sen Hatch ‘1952 law belies out progress in sciences’ (IP Watchdog) Ocean Tomo does rating deal with France’s state bank (IAM) Did you know... importation is a separate requirement in section 337 cases? [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Strunk v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
By contrast, the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is principally responsible for making policies for the administration of federal courts, has generally moved in the opposite direction from the states. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
The question many have is why The MLC, Inc. itself—a quasigovernmental organization operated by inferior officers[xiv] of the United States–is not the subject of an oversight hearing at Senate Judiciary regarding the hundreds of millions it is sitting on. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:42 pm
United States, No. 2007-5169 (Mar. 12, 2009), the U.S. [read post]
