Search for: "United States v. Henning" Results 341 - 360 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Soon thereafter, he filed an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office to register the mark. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Soon thereafter, he filed an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office to register the mark. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
§§ 948a et seq.] may be convened by the Secretary of Defense or by an officer or official of the United States designated by the Secretary for that purpose” (emphasis added by the court). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court could potentially change the securities class action litigation landscape in the United States, as the Court considers whether or not to dump the fraud on the market theory. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
 MCL 28.211a(b) defines `nonpublic information’ as `information to which access, use, or dissemination is restricted by a law or rule of this state or the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Columbia 1990), in which Judge Joyce Hens Green . . ., in the absence of D.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the federal district court's dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, rejecting her arguments that:(1) the limitations on her access to school property were not reasonable because no reasonable person could have believed that she was attempting to evade the school’s security procedures or that she otherwise presented a risk of disruption; and (2) in the absence of such a justification and because [the… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the federal district court's dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, rejecting her arguments that:(1) the limitations on her access to school property were not reasonable because no reasonable person could have believed that she was attempting to evade the school’s security procedures or that she otherwise presented a risk of disruption; and (2) in the absence of such a justification and because [the… [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Andrew Koppelman
By the end of 2008, approximately 32,000 same-sex couples had married in the United States, and 80,000 more were domestic partners, reciprocal beneficiaries, or united in civil unions. [read post]