Search for: "United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez" Results 341 - 360 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm
Category: Infringement    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor    TitleNazomi Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Category: Copyright    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleAmerican Inst. of Physics v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
Category: Interferences    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleSanofi-Aventis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Enter Agusto Niz-Chavez, a Guatemalan national who fled violence in his home country and arrived in the United States in 2005. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Dismissal to Bulk of Charges in Action Alleging Bribery in Iraq Oil-for-Food Program United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Dismissal to Bulk of Charges in Action Alleging Bribery in Iraq Oil-for-Food Program United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]