Search for: "United States v. Holland"
Results 341 - 360
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
The United States ratified the Hague Convention in 1988, and the Convention was implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:02 am
Mar. 31, 2010). http://tinyurl.com/y7w8py5 United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Landmark cases include – in addition to the recent case involving TD Securities – United States V. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am
“It was very interesting today, hearing your argument in Holland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
(This is also likely to be the case under the fledgling tort of intrusion into seclusion established in C v Holland [2012] NZHC 2155.) [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Bertone, 15 AD3d 326; Matter of Fischer-Holland v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Holland and Tyler A. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(PatLit) UK Supreme Court – The final battle in Star Wars copyright dispute (IP Osgoode) United States US Patent Reform The time for global harmonisation is now: so says David Kappos, Director of the USPTO (IPKat) Kappos seeks to fight patent reform opposition with facts (IAM) Why the Americans should leave Europe out of their first-to-invent debate – UPDATED (IAM) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
United States The post U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
United States The post U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
In what was the most politically charged case since Bush v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:52 pm
See, e.g., Holland v. [read post]
