Search for: "United States v. Interstate Circuit"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
But in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm
, I observed: “The Third Circuit’s decision Waterfront Commission v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
An informant reported to a drug unit officer that he had twice bought $100 worth of marijuana from the plaintiff. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
Chevrolet_Lumina_Minivan.jpg In highlighting use of FRE 803(17), in a carjacking prosecution, the Third Circuit finds no error in testimony by an agent that he used the vehicle's identification number (VIN) number to trace it on a database compiled by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) to its manufacture in a foreign state, helping to establish the interstate commerce element of the offense; noting that the NICB database was the "only… [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:32 pm
Lyons v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
He's been in the United States since 1993. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
Mar. 10, 2010) (en banc), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, sitting en banc, vacated the three-judge panel’s prior holding and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a Rule 10b-5 claim asserted by the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against defendants James Tambone and Robert Hussey. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
The United States Justice Department agrees. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:41 am
See Maxwell, 446 F.3d at 1216-17 (finding a market for child pornography and upholding congressional regulation of same); United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:23 am
US v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, scheduled for oral arguments in September before a panel of judges from the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
United States decision; and 2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s decision so holding infringes upon the Supreme Court’s retained and exclusive jurisdiction over the allocation of water from the Colorado’s mainstream under the Court’s 1963 Arizona v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 1056, 1062, “the [United States] Supreme Court reasoned the plain meaning of ‘engaged in’ interstate commerce in section 1 is narrower in scope than the open-ended phrase ‘involving’ commerce in section 2. [read post]
