Search for: "United States v. Interstate General Co." Results 341 - 360 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05640 (1st Dept., 2019) the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that  the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (ICPC), codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, does not apply to out‑of‑state noncustodial parents. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
In briefs in both cases last month, the outgoing acting solicitor general, Jeffrey Wall, urged the justices to grant cert and vacate the court of appeals’ decisions (both of which went against Trump) under United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
That case involves whether companies consent to a state’s courts having general personal jurisdiction over them by registering to do business there. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
As stated by General Counsel for Pernod Ricard Ian FitzSimons following the Third Circuit's decision, "We are determined to continue to fight for fair competition in the United States market where ownership of the ‘Havana Club' trademar [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm by Beth Graham
The judge also distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]