Search for: "United States v. Levine" Results 341 - 360 of 774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
Levin, in which it heard oral argument last week, as improvidently granted. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:13 am by Ruthann Robson
Given the procedural problems in the case as we discussed after oral argument last Monday, not surprisingly the United States Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (12-1493) have been granted. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
 There are several provocative employment law issues awaiting the High Court during the 2013-2014 term, including the first case scheduled for oral arguments, Madigan v Levin (Dkt No 12-872), in which the Court will determine whether state and local government employees may avoid the ADEA and bring age discrimination claims directly under the Equal Protection Clause and Section 1983. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:27 am
However, public employees can file suit under the United States Constitution (and a statute that allows lawsuits for infringement of constitutional rights, 42 USC s1983). [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:27 am
However, public employees can file suit under the United States Constitution (and a statute that allows lawsuits for infringement of constitutional rights, 42 USC s1983). [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:33 pm by Charles G. Kels
 Subsequent judicial interpretation of the Westfall Act confirmed that its grant of tort immunity to federal workers remains viable even when actual recovery against the United States under the FTCA is precluded. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am by Jon
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]