Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am
What kind of a defence does Lord Brown mean? [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
God and the Illegal Alien, United States Immigration Law and a Theology of Politics by Robert W. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Lord Neuberger in the Court of Appeal went as far as to state as follows. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
The European Commission’s guidance on the Directive’s transposition and implementation states that family membership in the direct line “extends to adoptive relationships” and calls on member states to secure children’s best interests in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Carnwath, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, and Lord Hamblen. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
One can easily agree with Lord Justice Buxton, and as he further states, 'use' should entail a more active component than just passively placing in in a sphere where it is easily accessed from, even by accident. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
