Search for: "United States v. Marti" Results 341 - 360 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 6:47 am by Chris Castle
It is important to understand that the United States agreed to be subject to the international treaties protecting moral rights and that these rights are different and separate from copyright. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am by Michel Paradis
United States, the Supreme Court held as much. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:39 am
The current article shows absolutezerounited is being sued in Arizona for harassing, threatening, and intimidating outspoken advocate Jan Kruska [Kruska v. perverted-justice.com, CV 080054, US Dist. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Whereas the the Senate bill requests information on the special counsel investigation as a whole, the House bill has a more specific ask: Each report … shall include but not be limited to … any evidence of criminal activity that implicates the President, any person within the Executive Office of the President at the time of the report or any time prior, or any person appointed as an officer of the United States by the President (regardless of whether or not that… [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Death penalty experts, moreover, note that of the five states allowing the death penalty for child rape, only one handed that sentence down. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am by Steve Vladeck
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The argument drew disagreement from Benjamin Wittes, Andrew Kent and Marty Lederman, which in turn provoked a response by Josh Blackman, who holds views similar to mine. [read post]