Search for: "United States v. Mauro"
Results 341 - 360
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
"The decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
United States, a securities-fraud case that they argue “represents yet another example of the overcriminalization that has run rampant throughout our legal system. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
We further note that a court has the discretion, under its general authority to supervise disclosure, to impose a specific deadline for expert disclosure under CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i), for example, prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness or prior to a motion for summary judgment (see Mauro v Rosedale Enters., 60 AD3d 401). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the justices held that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” under the appointments clause, who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head; they predict “interesting times ahead for the Administrative State. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Rachel VanLandingham urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
United States, “a case that could bring about profound changes in the way courts impose criminal fines, which serve as the principal sanction for organizations, including corporations. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
The First Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:33 am
On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The case “could have big implications for parties that have an interest in the development or protection of the seafloors surrounding the United States — environmentalists and industry actors alike,” Smith writes. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am
” The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times encourages the Court to “show the same solicitude for free speech” in Schwarzenegger as it did in striking down the speech restriction at issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
