Search for: "United States v. Obey" Results 341 - 360 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That part, in fact, is the one that determines which state and local governments must obey Section 5. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm by Sean Hanover
" PICCO, 411 U.S. at 674; United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  Since Congress wants us to obey Brady we must do so. [read post]
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Draconian penalties can be enforced for noncompliance, with online services potentially interfered with or banned entirely if companies don’t obey. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Draconian penalties can be enforced for noncompliance, with online services potentially interfered with or banned entirely if companies don’t obey. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The decision relied in significant part upon the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
"For the past 20-years, the congregation of the Westboro Baptist Church has picketed military funerals to communicate its belief that God hates the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality, particularly in America's military. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
Seattle (2007) (severely limiting affirmative action programs in primary and secondary schools); Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
United States); and a request to sort out a conflict among lower courts on when a bankrupt’s debts are barred from being forgiven because of fraud (Husky International Electronics v. [read post]