Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 341 - 360 of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2021, 2:51 am
           The Court reviewed the “mechanics” of applying the enhancement as set forth in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:41 am
Back in February, we hosted a guest post about United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:06 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit explained in Dippin’ Dots, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Accordingly, Congress amends the statute, and now says to the States: “From this point forward, it's the Carrot/Broccoli Distribution Act, and the package is carrots and broccoli. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:04 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington awarded Motorola Mobility, in a FRAND case brought by Microsoft, less than one-twentieth of a percent of its original demand. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm by David Lat
The most prominent law-related comment: President Obama calling on Attorney General Eric Holder “to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:46 am by Bradley Joondeph
But the Court’s affirmance in Lexmark was matched by a unanimous reversal in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]