Search for: "United States v. Reveles"
Results 341 - 360
of 708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:08 am
Finally, the vulnerabilities had to be “made and used” in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am
Even before Schrems, the United States took bigger steps in the direction of reforming surveillance than many appreciate. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:47 am
In The Author’s Guild v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
It was my word against that of the President of the United States, who was corroborated by former attorney general John Mitchell, former assistant to the president John Ehrlichman, and former assistant to the pre [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
However, the law allows the NSA to select targets who are non-U.S. persons located outside the United States on the basis of very broad criteria. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
Alex Loomis informed us of the ECJ’s decision that the United States does not provide adequate privacy protections and suggested that “the decision almost certainly poses the greatest economic threat to U.S. tech firms in the wake of the Snowden revelations. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Schrems’ concerns originated from revelations that came to public light as part of the Snowden affair in 2013, when EU citizens became aware that US intelligence services, in particular the National Security Agency (‘NSA’) could gain access to the data transferred from the EU to the US without US law and practice limiting such surveillance activity. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case, entitled Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
But something had to be done about the United States, which is by far the largest destination of personal data from Europe. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The case arises from a challenge to the transfer of personal data from the EU (via Ireland) to the United States, which relied on a Commission Decision 2000/520 stating that the Safe Harbour system in place in the United States was ‘adequate’ as permitted by Article 25 Data Protection Directive. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
