Search for: "United States v. Robinson" Results 341 - 360 of 948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31758 (ND NY, March 9, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Rastafarian inmate that he was permitted to wear his crown (a religious head covering) only in his cell and housing unit, and not outside of these areas.In Peele v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Progressive, Bill Blum considers the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts’ jurisprudence on voting rights in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
  Judge Robinson had concluded that the patent was valid, and applied the test articulated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 41360 (D NM, April 20, 2010), a New Mexico federal district court held that RLUIPA does not authorize prisoner claims of any sort against state officials in their personal capacities nor does it authorize claims for monetary damages (as opposed to other kinds of relief) against individuals in their official capacities.In Robinson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” The hosts of Words Matter (podcast) “sit down with Lauren Moxley, the host of The Ginsburg Tapes Podcast — which chronicles Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s oral arguments before the then all-male United States Supreme Court from 1972 to 1978 —before she became #Notorious RBG. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The third case in the trilogy of securities antitrust immunity, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Recently, the Defendants filed a Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, presenting the Court with the following questions: 1. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]