Search for: "United States v. Ross" Results 341 - 360 of 788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
The case—better known as Schrems II—threw into disarray the future of the $7.1 trillion economic relationship between Europe and the United States, which, as Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said, “is so vital to our respective citizens, companies, and governments. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Those challenges have alleged that Black defendants are more likely than White defendants to get death sentences, even when they commit comparable crimes.In 1972, the United States Supreme Court’s Furman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm by Thomas James
February 23, 2023) Getty Images has filed two lawsuits against Stability AI, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States, each alleging both input and output copyright infringement. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Burns, Judicial Corporal Punishment in the United States? [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am by John Malcolm
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture    Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm by Amy Howe
The justices will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at the decision. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Supreme Court of this state has never decided this question, in so far as we have been able to ascertain, but we are not left in the dark in the matter, because we find that no less eminent authority than the Supreme Court of the United States long ago decided this very question. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]