Search for: "United States v. Shaw"
Results 341 - 360
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:45 am
—George Bernard Shaw _____________________________________________________________1Zagis USA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 10:37 pm
Patent Nos. 5,527,982, 5,732,367, 5,916,123, 5,994,608, and 6,139,485), government contractor liability for patent infringement, dismissal of suit against contractor as the United States was the appropriate defendant, interpretation of language in government contracts pertaining to use of U.S. patents, use of contract here "for the Government" and "with the authorization and consent of the Government" to provide immunity to the defendant contractorWindy City… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
United States, 342 F.3d 133, 142 (2d Cir.2003). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In Sentient Jet LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Minow, Martha. 1998. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
State case), the US Supreme Court had just overruled one of its own prior cases: In Roper v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Court stated: “We have time and again forcefully rejected the notion that government actors may intentionally allocate preferences to those ‘who may have little in common with one another but the color of their skin” (quoting Shaw v. [read post]
