Search for: "United States v. US Currency"
Results 341 - 360
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 10:54 am
United States) that the abrogation was unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
US (510 US 135 (1994)). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Shavers argued that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is “not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 10:23 am
As similar cases arise in various circuits across the United States, the DOL’s response to the decision will likely be guided by whether other circuits give deference to such guidance. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
No false or forged documents were used to bring the items into the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:28 am
The stories are two sides of a single coin, which is the currency of settler colonialism in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:37 pm
Has held appointments as invited professor in universities in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
In T-Mobile v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
Critique As stated, the views above may not necessarily be correct in law. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 630 (1935). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
Lockwood and his wife with: tax evasion, conspiring to defraud the United States, bankruptcy fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and other federal crimes. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
