Search for: "Universal Products, Inc. et al"
Results 341 - 360
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 4:13 am
"Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish that Mark regularly worked in close proximity to asbestos-containing clutches, including those manufactured by Borg-Warner, to permit the issue of causation to go to the jury.Buttitta v Allied Signal, Inc. et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Google Inc. et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Camco Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Camco Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[et al.].Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2009. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Paris et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Paris et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:55 am
Patent 7669123:United States Patent 7,669,123 Zuckerberg , et al. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al v Abbott… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al v Abbott… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
(patent infringement) 1/15: Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia Corp., Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., Pharmacia & Upjohn LLC, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Powerscreen International Distribution Limited et al. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
RCM Digesters, Inc., 2009 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Lupin Ltd. concerning LoSeasonique and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling… [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
(IP Whiteboard) FrangranceNet - Keyword ad and product shots case survives motion to dismiss - FragranceNet v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rheingold et al proudly write, "Not only did the court deny all pending motions, he denied all future ones! [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v Johns Hopkins (ISinIP) … [read post]
