Search for: "Unknown Defendants A, B & C"
Results 341 - 360
of 486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
CICHON, ANDREW C. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour; Paragraph 3 a) shall not be held to preclude, in countries where imprisonment with hard labour may be imposed as a punishment for a crime, the performance of hard labour in pursuance of a sentence to such punishment by a competent court; For the purpose of this paragraph the term "forced or compulsory labour" shall not include:Any work or service, not referred to in subparagraph b), normally required of a person who is under… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
B. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:35 pm
Plan B Enterprises better have a Plan B. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
§ 6.602(b). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
§ 6.602(b). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
See id at 587–88 (“Cunningham’s legal dictionary, cited above, gave as an example of its usage a sentence unrelated to military affairs (‘Servants and labourers shall use bows and arrows on Sundays, & c. and not bear other arms’)”). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Here, as in Berardi, where it was unknown and unanticipated that the defendant would qualify for a disability pension, there was no reason to conclude that a general provision providing for equal distribution of "any pension" was intended to opt out of the controlling law in order to distribute portions of any such pension that would not ordinarily be subject to equitable distribution. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
These regulations are generally (a) triggered by (the threat of) an unpredictable event, (b) adopted and implemented under time pressure in a situation characterized by uncertainty, (c) shaped by prevalent interests and public attitudes, (d) dependent upon, and conditioned by, emergency risk communications, (e) characterized by their transnational need, and (f) unanticipated in existing regulatory schemes, even those that had expressly codified emergency responses to crises. … [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:25 am
In re Amy Unknown, 636 F.3d 190, 198 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:56 pm
Tosti d/b/a Sam & Jimmys Ho Bo Jungle Bar and JimSam, LLC, and unknown business entity d/b/a Sam & Jimmy's HO BO Jungle Bar of Evansville, Indiana has illegally intercepted and broadcast Ultimate Fighting Championship 106: Tito Ortiz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm
” As he puts it in a passage that will give a sense of the frustration of reading this document, One need imply neither bad faith nor lack of incentive nor ineptitude on the part of government officers to conclude that [REDACTION] compiled in the field by [REDACTION] in a [REDACTION] near an [REDACTION] that contain multiple layers of hearsay, depend on translators of unknown quality, and include cautionary disclaimers that [REDACTION] are prone to significant… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Here, there’s another claim, too, which might be the easiest to prove: negligence per se, in which a plaintiff alleges that the defendant violated a particular statute or regulation that was intended to protect like the plaintiff. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
By Glen C. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
A lot of people think that Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 in his first debate when he replied jokingly “there you go again” to then-President Carter’s attempt to portray him as some sort of rightwing nut intent upon destroying accepted government programs like Medicare.Whether one believes that President Reagan’s election was a good thing or a bad thing, there’s no denying that his disarming line was effective in dispelling his opponent’s attempt to… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
The parties granted each other reciprocal licenses to the patents at issue in that dispute, and they released and discharged each other from "any and all claims, demands or suits, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated whether or not asserted in the above case, as of this date, arising from or related to the events and transactions which are subject matter to this case. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
Carjacking Without a Weapon is a crime defined in Florida Statute 812.133(2)(b). [read post]
