Search for: "Unknown Miller"
Results 341 - 360
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Here we are again. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Those two cases are the consecutively numbered Miller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:39 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to… [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:51 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm
This untoward, anti-Congressional-intent result is only the more indefensible when one considers the nature of the red flags themselves, all of which -- or nearly all of which – were generally unknown to the small investor, but many of which -- sometimes most or all of which -- were known to the large institutions or investors whose cases have been brought to the District Court for the Southern District by withdrawals of references. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The first, was in the case of Ting Lan Hong v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 2995 (QB) – on which we have already commented. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
" Miller v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
" Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
App. 1985); Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Ghani himself dissolved the Afghan Ministry of Counter Narcotics in 2019, for reasons unknown to the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
Whose Authorization Matters—The Third-Party Accounts of Former Employees Two district courts in Virginia have parsed out a distinction regarding email access to the third-party accounts of former employees: following the employee’s termination, who is allowed to access the account and whose permission is required? [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
I was thrilled to attend The New Era of Trade Secret Law: The DTSA and other Developments, hosted by the IP Institute at Mitchell/Hamline School of Law and its Director, Sharon Sandeen, Robins Kaplan Distinguished Professor of Law. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
One will also encounter numerous works in the database marked “unknown,” e.g., https://www.universalclips.com/catalog-items/13872.)] [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:19 am
Estimating revenue from a state-level FTT is difficult given the unknown reaction by the financial markets and high risk of tax avoidance. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
By Dennis Crouch A group of sixty US intellectual property law professors have signed a letter to Congress supporting anti-troll patent reform legislation. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 10:39 pm
Chance Miller of 9to5Mac has a report with some screenshots showing how this works. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:09 pm
We had the honor to represent Richard Miller. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
