Search for: "Unnamed Defendant 10"
Results 341 - 360
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
Marshall (Case No. 10-cv-00450-DOC-RNB), filed April 12, 2010, in the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:25 am
Thus, the EADS case represents an example of an "f-squared" case, as described in an April 10, 2010 memo (here) by lawyers from the Wachtell Lipton firm (who represented the EADS defendants in the EADS case) on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Reform. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:14 am
AT the federal courthouse in Brooklyn, New York, the indictment was unsealed charging the 10 defendants, including three attorneys and two licensed real estate brokers, with conspiracy, bank fraud, and wire fraud arising out of …Read More... [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
Last May, Reed Smith announced a 10 percent across-the-board salary cut for its associates. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:55 am
" It continues, "In the indictment, the defendants allegedly agreed to pay a 20 percent commission to win a portion of a $15-million deal to outfit the presidential guard…with the understanding that 10 percent of that money would go directly to the defense minister and the other 10 percent would go to the sales agent (our agent) making the deal. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Under Tobacco II made clear that "the standing provision added by Proposition 64 'was not intended to have any effect at all on unnamed class members.'" Id. at 10 (quoting Tobacco II, 46 Cal.4th at 321.) [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:34 pm
Plaintiff’s sought certification of UCL and CLRA claims against defendant GNC for violation arising out of the “sale of products that contained androstenediol, a substance defined as a Schedule III controlled substance under California law. [read post]
Northern District Certifies Credit Card Deceptive Advertising Class in Greenwood v. Compucredit Corp
21 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
., at 10, 12. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
Michael Calmese, True Fan Logo, Inc. and Dan Mortense, Case No. 10-cv-00043 (D. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
’s clients had prevailed in a lawsuit and were owed $23 million, when in fact the firm had settled the case without the clients’ knowledge and had obligated them to pay $500,000 to the defendant. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
Defendants named in the lawsuit include Church Brothers LLC, Premium Fresh Farms, LLC, True Leaf Farms, LLC, Andrew Smith Marketing Corporation, Paul's Pak, Inc. and three unnamed manufacturers. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
The defendants in the lawsuit include Heartland Employment Services, Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America, HCR Manor Care Services, Manor Care, 8 unidentified entities and 10 unnamed individuals. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
In short, Tobacco II essentially ruled that, for purposes of standing, as long as a single plaintiff is able to establish that he or she relied on a defendant‟s false advertising, a multitude of class members will also have standing, regardless of whether any of those class members have in any way relied upon the defendant's allegedly improper conduct. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1254, 1267, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 538, 833 P.2d 545; Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:01 pm
Contrast the Northwestern approach to defending students’ federally protected rights to that of Duke. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:52 am
According to an Oct. 21 article in the Winchester Star, police say 18-year-old Diamond Mason and her passenger, an unnamed 22-year-old woman, are lucky to be alive after they crashed into a stone wall and a tree. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:52 am
This situation could, in many instances be considered unfair to defendants whose last conviction was so long ago that many children born afterward are now college students. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
According to Foley's filing, FireStar and Amphion said they would be willing to spend a total of between $5 million and $10 million on the litigation. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
On January 10, Ackenheil [told] Van Fleet . . . he was going to work for a competitor. . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Sept. 25, 2009) (AmLaw Daily registration may be required), the court refused to certify two classes of California and Pennsylvania consumers, respectively, who bought contact lens solution between September 1, 2004 and April 10, 2006 and discarded it after the defendant told consumers to do so. [read post]
