Search for: "Vaughn v. Vaughn" Results 341 - 360 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
” [Jack Shafer, Politico] Canada, farther down this road, moves toward outright government subsidies to newspapers [Mylene Crete and Jordan Press, Canadian Press] “Court tosses disbarred lawyer’s suit over newspaper article on his ethics case with a ‘crime’ header” [ABA Journal] Compelled speech in NIFLA v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In a 2-1 decision, the 3 judge panel upheld District Judge Vaughn Walker's lower court decision, but on much narrower grounds. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
The case was the result of an unusual fact pattern, but its principles are not limited, as noted in its companion case, Vaughn v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am by Anna Christensen
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic draws on the story of Judge Vaughn Walker, the George H.W. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
In Australia the patentability of such materials has recently been confirmed by the Federal Court of Australia in Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics Inc [2013] FCA 65 (15 February 2013)[3], see Vaughn Barlow, CIPA, March 2013, 122-123. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
"While it does not lie within the jurisdiction of the Board to enforce a contract between parties, Vaughn Russell Candy Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals agrees that plaintiff cannot sue the city.The case is Outlaw v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The Tax Court pointed out that failure to receive an information return, such as a Form 1099, does not transform gross income into excluded income, citing Vaughn v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:01 am by Administrator
Yes, according to a decision just released by an Ontario court in 395804 Ontario Limited (Blacklock’s Reporter) v Canadian Vintners Association, 2015 CanLII 65885 (ON SCSM). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm by Dale Carpenter
  That injury might arise because (1) Judge Vaughn Walker held Prop 8 unconstitutional, and/or because (2) they face imminent injury if same-sex couples start to wed when Walker’s ruling is enforced. [read post]