Search for: "Verizon Services Corporation" Results 341 - 360 of 448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 12:10 pm by Kashmir Hill
Said one tipster: I understand what a corporation which markets a product or non-legal service might be doing with this kind of data, but what purpose can it serve for a law firm? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 12:19 pm by Brett Trout
The Service Provider Lawsuit NPT previously sued wireless service providers AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint Nextel and Verizon. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Larry Downes
What is true is that consumers do not and aren’t likely to be asked to pay the true costs of broadband access given the intense competition in major markets between large ISPs such as Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and others. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Marvin Ammori
The consequences include heightened judicial aggression (1) against some long-established campaign finance rules (both disclosure and access rules), (2) against government rules (with 80-years of precedent) for assigning frequencies to those who communicate wireless-ly from CBS to Verizon (paraphrasing Larry Lessig and Yochai Benkler, eliminating the scarcity rationale would make CBS "unconstitutional"), (3) against numerous media ownership limits designed to ensure that a small… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Are the Latino organizations that are supporting the policies of the major corporations involved (the Washington Post, Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, etc.) selling out or acting in the best interests of their community? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais’s work on behalf of Verizon Wireless and several other cellular service providers was selected as Defense Verdict of the Week by The National Law Journal. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:53 pm by Berin Szoka
October 2007: A low-level Verizon employee initially declined to issue a short messaging (SMS) code to NARAL—allegedly because of anti-abortion bias. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
  Section 201 places a duty on carriers to extend services upon “reasonable request. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:37 pm by Kim Zetter
Someone opened a Verizon account in New York, leaving an unpaid bill of at least $186. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am by Marvin Ammori
It means, essentially, that the largest phone and cable companies can secretly block dozens of technologies used by large corporations, nonprofits, and individuals to speak and organize, and the FCC can do nothing to protect us. [read post]
Approximately 60 non-TARP companies, including Microsoft, Pfizer and Verizon, have either put, or announced plans to put, management say on pay proposals on their ballots. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:57 pm by Ryan Singel
Instead, these companies prefer to worry about the sensitivities of corporate-ass-covering lawyers and law enforcement agencies instead of putting their users and transparency first. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Marvin Ammori
But this Court doesn’t always miss an opportunity to transform the law.Second, I believed that Turner might have applied to cable operators in providing cable TV services, but not to operators when providing Internet access service. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:04 pm
Filed: January 25, 2010Per curiam opinionHeld: Affirming the district court’s setting aside of an arbitration award in which the arbitrator ignored critical language in an applicable collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the Court held that courts are bound to set aside awards when an arbitrator exceeds the scope of his authority and the express provisions in the parties' agreement.Facts: Verizon and a union disputed whether a local letter agreement was superseded by a… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:09 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
"  It seems that Cook was suggesting that AT&T may see more service strain than other carriers, such as Verizon, because AT&T has so many iPhone users and those iPhone users use so much more data on their phones than non-iPhone users. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:00 am by Susan L. Sipe
The Federal Communications Commission recently proposed new rules that would prevent giant Internet service providers, such as AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and others, from allowing the transmittal of web traffic of some websites at faster speeds than others allow. [read post]