Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 341 - 360 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Under this interpretation, a company can solicit thousands of potentially defamatory statements, "selec[t] and edi[t] … for publication" several of those statements, add commentary, and then feature the final product prominently over other submissions—all while enjoying immunity. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You wake up no longer owning a copy—a bit ironic.Why does this matter? [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
The district court judge pitched the case over personal jurisdiction, as well as the service spat, including sua sponte determining that Nuance hadn't even properly served the US Abbyy. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm by Paul D. Swanson
  Its regular corporate counsel does not engage in patent work, so it refers the company to a lawyer (Kathy Worthington) who is knowledgeable about intellectual property matters. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fashion: what really matters in fashion is the TM/brand. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
These matters can also be illustrated through a couple of cases from the US Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 6:18 pm
Id.The district court granted a defense motion to exclude evidence relating to this "honest services" fraud, because Alaska state law did not prohibit Weyhrauch from negotiating future employment with a company affected by pending legislation. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Or Joyce Carol Oates’ next roman a clef about a college football player who sues a video game company. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:47 am
He was too young to understand, and took the news matter-of-factly. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even if the consumer is getting them from Australia herself by buying them on eBay, apparently, the variation in details, including details in the warranty, still means that there will be confusion as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Alameda Books, Inc.Docket: 11-245Issue(s): Does the burden-shifting framework for evaluating the First Amendment constitutionality of a dispersal ordinance relating to adult businesses, established in an earlier decision in this matter, Alameda Books v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Kappos (SCt 08-964) Anyone with a lick of sense knew that Bilski wasn't going to get his patent claims granted. [read post]