Search for: "WEISS v. WEISS" Results 341 - 360 of 1,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 6:16 am
Posted by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Thursday, September 7, 2017 Editor's Note: The following post is based on a publication from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, authored by Brad S. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Tarlowe of the Paul Weiss law firm take a look at the Second Circuit’s decision in the Martoma case and the appellate court’s discussion of the personal benefit test. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:19 am
Marie-Andree Weiss on The 1709 Blog summarizes the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by the defendants in Solid Oak Sketches, LLC. v 2K GAMES, INC. and TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC., Case No. 1:16-cv-724-LTS-RLE. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:11 am by Walter Olson
Ted Frank, crusader against class action abuse and formerly a contributor to this blog, profiled [Caleb Hannan, Bloomberg] Judge: “Milberg attorneys engaged in an elaborate scheme of deceptive conduct” in qui tam relator case [Bailey McGowan/WLF, opinion in Leysock v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first decision to attempt this interpretation in light of the Internet was Weiss v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
The court denied Macy’s motion to compel arbitration, declining to follow an unpublished Second Circuit decision addressing an employee’s silence upon receipt of the identical form at issue here (Weiss v. [read post]