Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner" Results 341 - 360 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Where these three factors are present, this issue should be addressed by a criminal court as an exception to the mootness doctrine as held in People v Brown, People v Mejia, Matter of Crystal AA and Wagner v Infante. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, 88 AD2d 547, 548 [1st Dept 1982]; see Matter of Jacob D. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
See 11 KBW’s Education Law Blog for a concise overview or Adam Wagner’s post on the case. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
The Defendant in blank">Jones v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
Wagner,  ­Europäisches Kollisionsrecht 2011: ­Gegenläufige Entwicklungen, p. 1: The article gives an overview on the developments in Brussels in the judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from November 2010 until October 2011. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:20 am by Dorsey
As to the continued use of the employee’s name, a recent Minnesota case, Wagner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Th[e] failure to establish proximate cause mandates dismissal of a legal malpractice action, regardless of an attorney’s negligence” (Berkowitz v Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding, 34 AD3d 297, 297 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Th[e] failure to establish proximate cause mandates dismissal of a legal malpractice action, regardless of an attorney’s negligence” (Berkowitz v Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding, 34 AD3d 297, 297 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Cart v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 (21 June 2011)? [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
Wood is a Wisconsin criminal & DUI defense lawyer & shareholder at Van Wagner & Wood, S.C. in Madison, Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:50 pm
The military judge nevertheless instructed on LIOs and, in an opinion by then-Chief Judge Wagner, NMCCA rejected Miergrimado's argujment that United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:37 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Although the en banc Federal Circuit raised the bar for establishing inequitable conduct in Therasense v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]