Search for: "Walk v. Ohio Supreme Court" Results 341 - 360 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Statements made in prior litigation do not trigger recapture rule: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court Remains Skeptical of the “Cost-Benefit State” Amy Sinden (Temple University Law School) | Monday, September 26 Recent Court decisions have not created a presumption in favor of formal cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:33 am by Christy Unger
Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that a sentencer in a capital case not be precluded from considering and giving effect to mitigating factors); Johnson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 8 September 2015 there was a statement in open court in the case of Power Places Tours & ors v Free Spirit & anr before Warby J. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am by Steve Baird
Supreme Court gets it right and recognizes the difference between the right to register and the right to use, in the upcoming B & B Hardware case! [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Jeff Gamso
I was walking through an Ohio courthouse one day when a trial judge - tough, no-nonsense, former prosecutor, hard-nosed, but opposed to the death penalty - buttonholed me. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:59 am by Russ Bensing
  (And keep in mind that in Davis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
Suchomski, though, the Ohio Supreme Court held that a parent couldn’t be convicted for “proper and reasonable parental discipline. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:19 am
Suchomski, though, the Ohio Supreme Court held that a parent couldn’t be convicted for “proper and reasonable parental discipline. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]