Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Supreme Court seems skeptical of blocking Ohio law that removes voters from rolls. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Briefly: The editorial board of The Washington Times urges the justices to review Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
First on the agenda was Byrd v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Supreme Court looks for simple rules in complicated cases involving government searches. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “while the court seemed to think “common sense” and maybe even physics favored Florida, the powerful U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he legal fight [in Florida v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Roberts announced “an initiative … to ensure there are proper procedures in place to protect law clerks and other court employees from sexual harassment, saying it is clear that the federal judiciary ‘is not immune’ from a widespread problem. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Benisek v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary continues on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in “another dramatic reversal in a high-profile case before the high court,” the “Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to overrule a 40-year-old precedent that allows compelling public employees to pay some fees to unions that represent them, an important tool for the U.S. labor movement. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am
AFSCME to recognize public employees’ First Amendment rights against forced union agency fees [Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Aaron Barnes] More: Shapiro and Frank Garrison, National Review; Cato Podcast with Jacob Huebert and Caleb Brown; Silvester v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the case calls on the justices to “undertake[] a potentially landmark examination of how law enforcement’s use of technology impacts the American notion of privacy. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
” Briefly: For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in Christie v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
” Additional coverage of Gorsuch’s speech comes from Ariane de Vogue at CNN and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
