Search for: "Weaver v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2011, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:47 pm
Family members pled negligent infliction of emotional distress claims in the Complaint.Citing Weaver v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
[See, also, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, and County of Nassau (Department Of Public Works), U-27544, 6/26/08].However, the decision in the Weaver case, People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433, may have an impact on the use of GPS equipment, or the evidence obtained from such devices, in administrative disciplinary hearings.The Weaver decision indicates that “In the early morning hours of December 21, 2005, a State Police Investigator… [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
(Inand Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:28 am
State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
See Media Copyright Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
As this is a motion to dismiss, the Court may look only to the amended complaint and any evidentiary material submitted to remedy defects in the amended complaint in ascertaining whether a cause of action has been stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 635-636). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
Vernor v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
Weaver, 12 N.Y.3d 433, 882 N.Y.S.2d 357, 909 N.E.2d 1195 (May 12, 2009) (discussed here and posted here, to suppress that information because, as Alexandre found, and anyone must concede, taxicabs have always been regulated, and, in some cities and states, heavily regulated, as in NYC. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
The Ohio Supreme Court took a look at this back in 2004 in State v. [read post]
