Search for: "Will v. Hughes"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 9:59 am
Earlier today, in cxLoyalty, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
So when he announced in the New Haven Register that the case of State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:41 pm
SCOTUS on Monday summarily reversed the Ninth Circuit's denial of qualified immunity in Kisela v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Towards the end of his post this morning, Richard brings up an interesting issue that arose during arguments in Hughes v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:36 pm
Default Judgments in Cook Productions Case The Ohio case of Cook Productions, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
This is the second time that the Strasbourg Court has considered the right to be forgotten (we wrote about the Court’s judgment in the Article 8 case of ML & WW v Germany, 28 June 2018, in an earlier post). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Lords Neuberger, Mance, Reed and Hughes agreed with it. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm
Bose Corporation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Sources: Hughes v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Reliance was placed on the English case of Cartier International AG v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
At the end of July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:28 pm
by Dennis Crouch In 2022, the Federal Circuit issued a Judge Hughes decision in IBM v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
ComptonCitizenship, Gender, and Conscience: United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
On 12 October 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in Cooper v Evans & Anor [2023] EWHC 2555 (KB) in favour of the defendants. [read post]
