Search for: "Williams v. D" Results 341 - 360 of 4,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
4 May 2007, 3:05 am
Plaintiff did not allege his religion or how he was unjustifiably prevented him from engaging in conduct mandated by his faith.In Williams v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
Oman (William & Mary Law School) has posted Natural Law and the Rhetoric of Empire: Reynolds v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:20 am by Amy Howe
More commentary on Monday’s opinion in Foster v. [read post]