Search for: "Williamson v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, issued an opinion on September 7, 2010. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
_________________________________________________  United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm by Helen Alvare
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
They granted a petition filed by Pankajkumar Patel, a citizen of India who came to the United States without authorization nearly 30 years ago. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Lurking through cases that offered heightened scrutiny outside the normal tiered rubric was a lingering fear of the spirit Lochner, in this body Williamson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am by SHG
From United States v. [read post]
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ongoing debate in the United States over the implementation of net neutrality, following the Federal Communications Commission decision to repeal enforcement laws, continues following AT&T releasing a statement in support of legislative change. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steven Schwinn
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]