Search for: "Wise v. Director"
Results 341 - 353
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
It is intimately familiar with the political realities in every jurisdiction in the state, and over the years I found its recently retired field director, Jerome Gray, to have an immensely sophisticated and wise understanding of both the theory and reality of local and state politics. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:53 pm
The Court relies on the SCC decision in Peoples v Wise (SCC 2004). [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
Stone v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
What do YOU need to do, task-wise? [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
The Court’s subsequent denial of certiorari in Eichorn v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
"But if they seek relief from the SEC, we are prepared to go to court to preserve the [AFSCME v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Box 14115 Baton Rouge, LA 70898 Phone: (225) 925-9500; (800) 270-6185 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: cpourciau@latan.org Web: http://www.latan.org LATAN Northwest P.O. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:15 pm
Jim Copland, the director of the Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute, provides this particularly lucid analysis of the important legal and public policy issues involved in the pending Supreme Court case of Stoneridge Investment v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2006, 9:49 am
"Also, in Bailey v. [read post]
