Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
Bukartyk, R (on the application of) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin) A judicial review of a refusal to take a second homeless application which should really be put in the ‘Councils, don’t do this’ list of things that councils shouldn’t do. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Jay J then heard an application in the case of Wright v Granath before Jay J. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm
Teresa Ward v LB Hillingdon. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
On the Thornton issue, Lord Sumption (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) said: 7. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
IPSO IPSO’s Complaints Committee has ordered the Jewish Chronicle to publish a 1,300-word adjudication after it failed to produce evidence to support claims it made about a Labour activist. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am
R ((DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 October 2019 and 8 October 2019 . [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm
This will provide some additional clarity on the correct application of the principles set out by Lord Sumption in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Lord Reed gave a dissenting judgment. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 4:36 pm
The Daily Mail’s uploading of Hill’s intimate images without her consent might well be defended by the words of Lady Hale and Lord Toulson in Rhodes itself; “freedom to report the truth is a basic right to which the law gives a very high level of protection. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
The hearing will feature testimony from Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Behler, the director of operational test and evaluation in the office of the secretary of defense; Lt. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
As Gray J put it in Charman v Orion at [11] “The exercise is essentially one of ascertaining the broad impression made on the hypothetical reader by the [words complained of] taken as a whole. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm
The copyright in the letters however, as opposed to their physical manifestation, belonged to the author of the words, not the recipient of the paper on which they were written. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am
In my defence this decision is unlikely to be the last word on this point (more on that later) and this is a roundup of several cases. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm
On 4 November 2019 Warby J gave judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
The scope of the claim was thus rendered uncertain (in Lord Justice Floyd preferred wording) or ambiguous (in Lord Justice Lewison’s preferred wording). [read post]
