Search for: "Worth v. Price*"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
But Eros v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
68.2(1) is not only unsupported by the purpose of the Board’s price-setting role, it is, respectfully, also in direct conflict with that purpose. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
According to US Consumer Price Index (CPI) statistics during those seven decades, the buying power of 2 cents in 1909 required the approximate equivalent of 14 to 15 cents in 1978.[8] A songwriter or composer would have needed to earn about 750% of the original 2 cent royalty rate to have maintained his or her cost-of-living standard. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
In an industry focused on revenue and profit, where does something like customer experience stand in the priorities of legal providers? [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
The first is increasing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) budget by $80 billion, primarily to hire more agents and increase auditing rates for high-income and high-net-worth taxpayers and for corporations. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
In TransUnion v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
Hisley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 7:42 pm
A recent decision in Riddell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:26 pm
LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:35 am
The substance of Hinkle’s order is worth a close look. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:47 am
Another feature of this complaint worth noting is that the complaint both follows and is based on the publication of a short seller report about the defendant company. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
At the close of 2020, the GPFG owned 0.56 per cent of the company’s shares, worth approx. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Among other things, she referred to the Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Not only was the plaintiff’s evidence – consisting mainly of the opinions of an outside expert with “no involvement in the relevant events” – unconvincing, but Pretium adduced evidence to rebut it.[7] Plaintiffs pursuing relief for secondary market liability would do well to evaluate the strength and weaknesses of their own evidence and consider whether pursuing a case that has a reasonable possibility of success, is worth the time and expense where there is a… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Not only was the plaintiff’s evidence – consisting mainly of the opinions of an outside expert with “no involvement in the relevant events” – unconvincing, but Pretium adduced evidence to rebut it.[7] Plaintiffs pursuing relief for secondary market liability would do well to evaluate the strength and weaknesses of their own evidence and consider whether pursuing a case that has a reasonable possibility of success, is worth the time and expense where there is a… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:00 pm
The Court cites Polk Bros. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
