Search for: "sauer sauer" Results 341 - 360 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm by Patti Spencer
Paul and Jodie Sauers divorced in 2002, and Paul did not change the beneficiary on a $40,000 employee group life insurance plan subject to ERISA. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d 438, 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm by Patti Spencer
Paul and Jodie Sauers divorced in 2002, and Paul did not change the beneficiary on a $40,000 employee group life insurance plan subject to ERISA. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The proposed amendment failed to sufficiently allege that “but for” the defendants’ alleged negligence, the plaintiffs “would not have incurred any damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302). [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:25 pm by Travis Andring
“Because it is improbable that [Snake River] was able to resume operation with the Station’s licensed facilities after dismantling its tower, we are designating an issue to determine whether the Station’s license expired . . . because the station failed to operate with its authorized facilities for more than 12 months,” Media Bureau Chief Holly Sauer wrote in the Hearing Designation Order released this week. [read post]
5 May 2007, 3:12 am
Sauer ruled after a hearing....She was then ordered to report to a women's jail in suburban Lynwood by the set date or face 90 days behind bars. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm by Josh Blackman
SG John Sauer represents Missouri and SG Elizabeth Murrill represents Missouri. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must also prove that, but for the defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff would have been successful in the underlying action or not sustained the alleged damages (Rudolph v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442-443 [2007]). [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:54 pm
Sauer did not believe Hilton, her spokesman or her attorneys, saying he had no doubt that Hilton knew her license was suspended. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s alleged damages, as they relate to legal expenses defending the specific performance action, may be found to be proximately related to defendant’s negligent advice related to the issue of the contingency clause (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443). [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:13 am
Dachs, attorneys with Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, analyze a new bill which, once signed into law, will dramatically change the rules of the game in relation to the timing for giving notice of claim, as well as the scope of future litigation in this particular area of insurance law. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dismissal of the legal malpractice counterclaim was warranted because defendant failed to adequately plead proximate causation (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the services he provided in Weinberg v Sultan, plaintiff simply asserted that defendant and her daughter were unable to provide facts concerning the closing, but made no showing that his investigation of the case, preparation of the complaint, and conduct of the litigation met the standard of “ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker, & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:36 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Investigators say he was in possession of a loaded Sig Sauer 9mm pistol. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s contention that the motion court in the fee dispute would have awarded her predecision interest pursuant to CPLR 5001 is at best speculative (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 443 [2007]; see also Manufacturer’s & Traders Trust Co. v Reliance Ins. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., 82 AD3d 849, 850 [2011]; Leach v Bailly, 57 AD3d 1286, 1289 [2008]; but see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 444 n 3 [2007]). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Connie Crosby
I don't usually talk about sales on this blog, but I happened to notice a few book sales you may find of  interest--check these out: Information Today - library, information management and knowledge management titlesMichael Sauers has posted about the Information Today sale on books from Internet Librarian 2010 conference being extended to January 31, 2011: 40% off the retail price on all books. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:23 am
"A person with a five-year contract will get paid only for the current year if he suffers a career-ending injury," Professor [Skip] Sauer [of The Sports Economist fame] noted. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:59 pm
Heuser incorrectly writes:The biotech industry appears to have prevailed, at least partly, in a significant early battle.Yesterday the House judiciary committee completed its mark-up of the bill and eliminated the new avenue to challenge patents, according to an analysis by Hans Sauer, an intellectual-property lawyer for the Biotech Industry Organization in Washington.Only the "second window" of post-grant review was removed in the House bill. [read post]