Search for: "v. Atkins"
Results 341 - 360
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had yet to announce the constitutional rule, under Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 8:34 pm
In Atkins v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:24 am
The case involved Florida’s rule establishing an absolute cutoff for execution under Atkins v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:59 am
The Supreme Court previously held in Atkins v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:43 pm
Kent discusses Hall v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:03 am
Kennedy’s opinion for the majority insisted that the Court was not moving the rule of law on executing those who claim intellectual disability very far from where it had left that question twelve years ago in Atkins v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:46 am
Writing for the Court, Justice Kennedy, joined by the Court’s four liberal justices, held that Florida’s law unconstitutionally limits the ability of capital defendants to demonstrate that they are mentally impaired under Atkins v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am
Corp. v Utilisave, LLC, 63 AD3d 840 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Coverage of the Court’s decision in Schuette v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:31 pm
Atkins. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:47 pm
U.S. ex rel Barko v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm
Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnd the converse, says the Ninth, saves nothing, reports Michael Atkins: On June 11, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Western District’s award of attorney’s fees on the false designation of origin claim in Derek Andrew, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:46 am
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
Florida, the follow-up case to Atkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:18 pm
Florida [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court will decide "whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
