Search for: "v. Taylor et al" Results 341 - 360 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am by Jamie Baker
Catherine Martin Christopher, et. al., Will I Pass the Bar Exam? [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by KC Johnson
"Once again: Tyson does not challenge in any way the data that Arcidiacono, et al., presented, that black students at Duke disproportionately migrate away from more difficult (science and engineering) to easier (liberal arts) majors. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
(as he then was) in  King et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
  Back in history the Popes wielded considerable power, could start Crusades and organise for Inquisitions to be set up by Torquemada et al… hey ho… times have moved on. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:59 am
§ 7003 (2000).4  Taylor v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by admin
Burkel, et al., for the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” 384 New Engl. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
The emphasis is therefore on its being a distraction, something that gives pleasure (see ‘Sports Law' by Gardiner et al (Cavendish, 1998). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Upper Deck et al (CAFC 2009-1022) precedential The facts supposedly uncontested, the decision was a treated as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Second Taylor Wessing Global IP Index reviews 24 places to litigate patents (PatLit) Discussion of ‘IFI Patent Intelligence Analysis of 2008’s Top US-Patent Recipients Suggests America May be Losing Dominance: Companies Outside the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Second Taylor Wessing Global IP Index reviews 24 places to litigate patents (PatLit) Discussion of ‘IFI Patent Intelligence Analysis of 2008’s Top US-Patent Recipients Suggests America May be Losing Dominance: Companies Outside the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]