Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 6,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia explained in his concurring opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
” Under Chevron, the Court ordinarily defers to an administering agency’s reasonable statutory interpretation, and Justice Antonin Scalia gave such deference to the EEOC’s interpretation of the ADEA in his concurring opinion in Smith. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:05 am
First, Justices Antonin Scalia and Elena Kagan visited the University of Mississippi School of Law on December 15, where their conversation with Jack Wade Nowlin touched on a range of topics such as judicial philosophies, the Supreme Court press corps, and their relationships with their colleagues on the Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
This Term, two Justices — Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — have voted in favor of delaying lower court rulings striking down marriage bans. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
In the ABA Journal, Debra Cassens Weiss reports that “Justice Antonin Scalia relied on an often-used quotation” earlier this month “when he admitted overlooking an issue in a prior case which led to the appearance of inconsistency. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:34 pm
Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas simply noted that they would have granted the plea by state officials to extend the postponement beyond the early January date. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
I have posted an article on Salon about Justice Antonin Scalia's recent comments on torture. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
I have posted an article on Salon about Justice Antonin Scalia's recent comments on torture. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:24 am
Justice Antonin Scalia responded with a blistering dissent, joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Elena Kagan, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
” Justices Elena Kagan and Antonin Scalia were not on the bench yesterday. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:04 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Anthony M. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Elena Kagan [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:33 am
The always informative, entertaining, and just plain awesome Green Bag has published its most recent micro-symposium, this one focused on Reading Law by Justice Antonin Scalia and Prof. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 7:09 pm
"'La torture pas anticonstitutionnelle', dit le doyen de la Cour supreme US": Yesterday, Radio Television Suisse aired an interview with Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:40 pm
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is joining the debate over the Senate’s torture report by saying it’s hard to rule out the use of extreme measures to extract information if millions of lives were threatened. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Justice Antonin Scalia immediately responded, to laughter, that a “living Federal Tort Claims Act is what we’re talking about here. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am
Instead, this led to a tangent on whether the district judge had entered a judgment on the dismissal of Gelboim’s claims, with Waxman sparring with Justice Antonin Scalia and Ginsburg over what the district court did and what the Second Circuit meant in saying “a final order has not been issued by the district court as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Andrew Brasher, the solicitor general of Alabama, was immediately asked by Justice Antonin Scalia how the state could advocate reading in a limitation (commercial and industrial entities) from subsections (b)(1) through (3) of the statute when that limitation was not included in subsection (b)(4), which is the provision at issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm
That contention sparked an extended colloquy with Justices Antonin Scalia and Sonia Sotomayor, which ended up using about a quarter of Isaacson’s argument time. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
It did not take long in Monday’s one-hour argument for Justice Antonin Scalia to make it plain that he would work diligently to steer the Court away from putting back into use the long-avoided non-delegation doctrine, last applied to nullify a federal law in the New Deal era case of Carter v. [read post]
