Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2025, 5:50 am
When multiple cases on the same issue are filed across the United States, the Panel can decide whether a case is appropriate for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2025, 4:53 am
But as far back as the New Deal-era case Carter v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
So the immediate question is whether federal and state executive branch agencies will be able to do so through their regulatory processes. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
It requires understanding the purpose of the creation of a third coequal branch, the judicial branch, with the attendant common law judicial powers and restraints. [read post]
17 May 2022, 5:00 am
United States (1879) is one of the oldest Free Exercise Clause precedents. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
But if it ever did, then of course what the United States itself argued about attorney culpability in the Justice Case could be pertinent to any claims and defenses raised in such an international tribunal.4. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
See 18 U.S.C. 1505 ("Whoever corruptly . . . influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
§ 455 and Canons 3C(1) and 3D of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
” Even “more critically,” he added, “no court should be able to order than an alien captured and detained abroad during wartime be admitted and released into the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
United States Servicemen’s Fund, a Senate committee was investigating the fund’s efforts to sow opposition to the Vietnam War amon [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm
United States, 492 F.3d 1309 (2007), and is sometimes referred to simply as the “Blue & Gold rule. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
