Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
See Gutierrez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:47 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California rendered its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Weaving v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
(See “California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:01 am
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:22 pm
Here, in UPS v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:01 am
Where defendant was under state probation that included a search term and he was revoked and put back on probation with new conditions and no express search term, California law precluded a search term under such circumstances. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 2:38 pm
California. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
A recent California decision, Koch v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:58 am
To obtain these personnel records, the party seeking disclosure must file a written motion, colloquially referred to as a “Pitchess” motion in reference to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Pitchess v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 1:38 pm
Graduated from Berkeley Law. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 11:20 am
Starbucks had alleged violations of Labor Code §351 and Business and Professions Code §17200, California's unfair competition law as a result of the managers taking portions of the tips left by patrons in the tips jars. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:03 pm
(Adams v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
In Sybase, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:16 am
Kleffman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In order to find a way to force the injured plaintiff into individual (non-class) arbitration, the majority held that California's bedrock common-law rule of contract interpretation, that ambiguities in a contract are construed against the drafter, is preempted by the FAA. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am
See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app The post Sacramento police close 16th at V Street for hit-and-run investigation appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Thus, “Where an advertisement does not incorporate the plaintiff’s trademark, there is no likelihood of confusion as a matter of law” (cites to 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
