Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 3581 - 3600 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Dissents rarely are read from the bench in the High Court's chamber; this one signaled a strong warning from the Court's liberal wing that the government had gone too far by criminalizing free speech in the name of national security.This case (actually two cases) involved application of a 1996 federal law banning "material support" to known foreign terrorist organizations black-listed by the Secretary of State. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am by Adam Schlossman
  Specifically, in Politico, Kenneth Vogel examines what he describes as a “largely overlooked passage” in a 1996 article in the University of Chicago Law Review, “in which Kagan seems to diminish as anomalous the Supreme Court’s ruling in Austin v Michigan Chamber of Commerce…which allowed governments to bar corporations from paying for ads supporting or opposing candidates. [read post]
23 May 2023, 10:24 am by Epstein Becker Green
Now is a good time to take a wholistic review of restrictive covenant practices, in particular as state laws are quickly evolving. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
The Nigerian plaintiffs in Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Youkhanna v City of Sterling Heights, 2017 WL 2798386 (ED MI 6/28/2017)Filed under: Open Meetings, Uncategorized [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Knockoff Oscars: 2008 Plagiarius awards announcedNo touch of mink: TTAB rules that "Mink" is misdescriptive for synthetic shoesOne ring to rule them both: PA court rules c.z. engagement ring didn't invalidate prenupBrutta figura: Fakes, immigrant sweatshop labor cheapen "Made in Italy" labelItalianate… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
  Thus, I was particularly amused to learn that my love of Latin is shared by The Onion which explained its Latin motto, tu stultus es, in an amicus brief filed yesterday with no less than the United States Supreme Court in Novak v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:52 pm
SCOTUSBLog is the go-to source on that topic and also on SCOTUS' decision yesterday to overturn Michigan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by John Steele
Duane Morris will make it easier for clients in that state to "settle and sue. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:22 am by David Post
[The case, in the Southern District of NY, is captioned “Puerto 80 Projects v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:28 am
Finally, a reminder in Webber v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
But we are not actually bound to do so or (in theory, at least) to follow a decision of the Grand Chamber. [read post]