Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3581 - 3600 of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2017, 9:23 am by John C. Manoog III
Such a situation does not necessarily result in a new trial, since there are multiple factors that must cut in the defendant’s favor in order for such relief to be granted. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
Defendant’s orthopedist does not address the issue of proximate cause of the injuries and does not rule out that the herniated discs were not caused by the subject accident, nor does he dispute that the plaintiff sustained such injuries. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:44 am by Brian McKeen
One order said participation would only “annoy, embarrass, and unduly burden” the physicians. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:06 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
While my focus here is on what copyright does and does not protect, the legal battle between Barbara Chase-Riboud, and Steven Spielberg and his production company also raises ethical questions about acts of copying that the law does not deem infringing. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:06 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
While my focus here is on what copyright does and does not protect, the legal battle between Barbara Chase-Riboud, and Steven Spielberg and his production company also raises ethical questions about acts of copying that the law does not deem infringing. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:50 pm
This fact does entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing, and the defendant was afforded this hearing on July 7, 2010 and January 14, 2011. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The post Does a Dirty Trash Pull Provide Probable Cause to Search a Residence? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The indictment does not specify the amount of the allegedly fraudulent claims or the amount that was fraudulently obtained from any of the three insurance carriers. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The indictment does not specify the amount of the allegedly fraudulent claims or the amount that was fraudulently obtained from any of the three insurance carriers. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:31 am by The Docket Navigator
[Defendant] had actual knowledge of the [patent-in-suit], and the . . . patent licensed by [defendant] refers to the [plaintiff's] patent. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:13 am by Eric Turkewitz
Defendant Novartis, seeing a profile picture of the plaintiff on her Facebook page that it claimed showed her to be smiling, used that as a basis to demand “log-in information to all of her social- networking websites and a release allowing Defendant to obtain documents directly from those websites so that Defendant could inspect all documents that relate to her claim. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Writing for ten of the court's sixteen judges, Judge Alice Batchelder concluded binding Supreme Court precedent provides that the right does not attach prior to indictment. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While the motion to controvert a search warrant itself would qualify as an excludable pre-trial delay, the mere request for a copy of the search warrant and affidavit in support thereof does not. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
Does an Affirmative Defense in an Answer have to state factual grounds? [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
But most evidentiary objections are waived if the opposing party does not make them. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:12 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
In many cases, the State does not have direct evidence and relies on circumstantial evidence to prove its case. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:19 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
In such cases, if the plaintiff does not produce sufficient evidence to refute the defendant’s position, the plaintiff’s case may be dismissed. [read post]