Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 3581 - 3600 of 29,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Myers, 308 F.3d 251, 258 (3d Cir. 2002), the court concluded that a frisk inside one’s home is permissible if limited to the extent necessary to protect police and secure the situation. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Evan Brown
LoopNet, Inc., 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004), the court observed that “[a] defendant may be held vicariously liable for a third party’s copyright infringement if the defendant ‘[1] profits directly from the infringement and [2] has a right and ability to supervise the direct infringer. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:27 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The Minnesota Supreme Court imposed discipline for frivolous litigation and related violations the referee found that Butler pursued a pattern of frivolous litigation, fraudulently joined law firms and attorneys as defendants, refiled previously dismissed matters, and failed to pay sanctions... [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Steve Davies
Burlington Northern R.R., Inc., 23 F.3d 1508, 1511 (9th Cir. 1994)); see also Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:50 am by David Oscar Markus
Nasir, 982 F.3d 144, 177 (3d Cir. 2020) (en banc) (Bibas, J., concurring). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:29 am by Jon Sands
  The defendants were convicted of maliciously damaging real property (wildfires) in violation of 18 USC 844(f)(1). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm by Jon Sands
Meza-Villarello, 602 F.2d 209 (9th Cir. 1979), was not an element of the § 1326 case, and so the government presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tropicana Prods., Inc., 690 F.2d 312, 316 (2d Cir. 1982), was in applicable. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:50 am by Jon Sands
Austin, 676 F.3d 924 (9th Cir. 2012), the 9th used the narrowest interpretation on which a majority of justices agreed. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:08 am by Docket Navigator
[F]or a district court to take up a declaratory judgment suit the court must be 'convinced that by its action a useful purpose will be served.' . . . [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
 According to the defendants, this did not provide sufficient notice to them in order to frame a response. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does not even mean you get a chance to defend yourself before the government commits the deprivation, so long as you have a post-deprivation chance to defend yourself and correct the injustice.The case is Chunn v. [read post]