Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 3581 - 3600 of 29,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It's asking the court to "order Defendants to remove the challenged statements from its website, print a retraction in the next issue of Anesthesiology, and prohibit the individual defendants from publishing or circulating the challenged materials, pending resolution of this suit. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 1:27 pm by Bill Marler
In 1998, Marler Clark was formed by the unlikely pairing of Bill Marler, who represented the victims in the 1993 Jack-in-the-Box E. coli Outbreak, and Bruce Clark, who defended the company. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 10:57 am by Jonathan F. Marshall
The seasoned New Jersey DWI defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm by Jon L. Gelman
  The intent that embraced the creation and development of the social insurance system has given the Court a rational and logical basis, consistent with public policy, to order medical marijuana for palliative care.The syllabus prepared by the Office of Clerk is as follows:In this appeal the Court considers the challenges brought by defendant M&K Construction (M&K) with regard to a workers’ compensation court’s order (the Order) that M&K reimburse plaintiff… [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:50 am by Christopher Tyner
Harris County, Texas, 882 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 2018) suggest that courts are becoming increasingly skeptical of the constitutionality of bail systems that leave open the possibility of wealth-based detentions when there is no determination that detention is necessary. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Big Data Regulatory Debates in the EU Wang, F. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
“Copy Me That” (I’m pretty sure no IP lawyer recommended that name–it’s like a confession for copyright defendants) makes an app to help users manage recipes. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 12:00 am
[dramatic pause...deep voice] M o  r  t g  a  g  e   F o r e c l o s u r e s! [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:48 pm by Peter Briccetti
Before this decision, the False Claims Act was interpreted to only protect whistleblowers from retaliation during the period of time that they were employed by the defendant, excluding whistleblowers who suffered post-employment retaliation. [read post]