Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2020, 3:19 am
So he does a lot with the supernatural, which Marlene Gebauer 1:17 Yeah, we’ll send me the link. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
The following categories were used by eGT: Peer Group#1: DMEPOS Supplier Not Likely to Have Orthotist Training Medicare Specialty Code Medicare Provider / Supplier Type Description A6 Medical Supply Co. with Respiratory Therapist B1 Oxygen Supplier 54 Medical Supply Co. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
”9 However, an employer may “make preemployment inquiries into the ability of an applicant to perform job related functions”10 and may also “require a medical examination after an offer of employment has been made to a job applicant and prior to the commencement of the employment duties of such applicant, and may condition an offer of employment on the results of such examination”11 so long as: 1) “all entering employees are… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[3] Opponents argue that because the primary function of cheerleading is not competition, it does not meet the qualifications of a sport.[4] The answer to this debate depends on your definition of a sport.[5] The NCAA, the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Here, the record does not reflect an abuse of that discretion. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
By Diane G. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
The government has taken the position that once the search warrant has been issued, courts cannot manage how the government conducts the search.[1] The government has strenuously opposed courts conditioning search warrants on the government providing search protocols for the review of electronic data, and has also resisted providing courts with a time range in which the search will be completed.[2] The government has also tried to defend, albeit unsuccessfully, a search of… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Here are five unanswered questions from Ramos. 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
I agree with Baert that the case presents issues of national and public importance, including: 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
Article 1 (¶1.4). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
’s statements otherwise, the majority “does indeed expand upon (and, I say, confuse) the law set forth in Bhasin” (Callow, Brown J., para. 152). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 8:42 am
Common position of the African Union (2024) Contents 1 Introduction2 Applicability of international law3 Sovereignty4 Due diligence5 Prohibition of intervention6 Peaceful settlement of disputes7 Use of force8 Attribution9 International humanitarian law (jus in bello)10 International armed conflict11 Non-international armed conflict12 Conduct of hostilities13 Attacks against persons14 Proportionality15 Specially protected persons, objects and activities (international… [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:14 pm
Texas' "subjugation rate" (the number of people in prison, jail, on probation and on parole) declined from 1 in 22 a decade ago to 1 in 41 today. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
Points of real divergence 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 2:59 am
Department of Agriculture often does. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
Thus, the consultation process does not give Indigenous groups a veto over what can be done with land pending final proof of their claim. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965), and Haig v. [read post]
