Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
Does this trend reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
Does this reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Section 3(1) establishes a civil cause of action: “(1) An actual or apprehended breach of section 1(1) may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
Slip op. at 10 n.41. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm
Senate, where the bill now resides, is on recess for the remainder of the week and does not return until February 28, leaving four days to pass and sign a bill. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
In other words, a candidate does not lose his or her right under the RTI Act only because he or she has agreed to sit for JEE or GATE. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
These are: 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:01 am
§ 41(d)(2). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
In the courts SA (Iranian Arabs-no general risk) Iran CG [2011] UKUT 41 (IAC) (10 February 2011) Upper Tribunal: Being Iranian Arab does not itself generate risk of persecution upon return to Iran. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
The penalty does not prevent criminal prosecution in appropriate cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
Very briefly, in 2005 the Strasbourg Court ruled, in the case of Hirst v UK (2006) 42 EHRR 41, that this blanket ban violated the right to vote under Article 3 Protocol 1. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
See Facts 1 and 4. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
" Br. 7-10 § A.1. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:33 am
Benally, 546 F.3d 1230, 1235-36, 1239-41 (10th Cir.2008). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section 27… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
” James Pooley, Trade Secrets § 2.02[1] (2010). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
For example, in Mahon v Post Publications [2007] 3 IR 338, [2007] IESC 15 (29 March 2007), Fennelly J for the majority held 41. [read post]
