Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 3,959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2009, 10:46 am
Who does care? [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:43 am
.* * * * * While the allegations in the complaint and the affirmation of the attorney for the Plaintiff do not allege either "wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations" on the part of the Defendant or that the salutary purposes of New York Insurance Law Article 51 are in danger of being undermined by the actions of the Defendant as required to support punitive damages (4 N.Y. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
., 28 B.C.L.R. 230, [1981] 5 W.W.R. 24, 21 C.P.C. 260, [1982] I.L.R. 1-1459, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 455 (C.A.). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Finally, the Third Department did annul 10 of the originally sustained 51 of 69 charges against Tsirelman, finding that, with respect to the billed NDPs, "the evidence does not support the Committee's conclusion that petitioner ordered treatment not warranted by the patients' condition. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:50 pm
I think it does. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:14 pm
It is not something created by the user; rather, it is based on what the user does with their computer. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
§ 51-7-80 through 51-7-85, passed in 1989, provides liability for making a claim or defense in litigation that is made with malice or without substantial justification. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The FBI estimated that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes targeted by Operation “Malicious Mortgage. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Potter, 51, Del Monte Foods Co.Thomas L. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
The ribbon is the #1 reason why, I “Mr. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Modification of Work Opportunity Credit IRC § 51 allows employers to take a work opportunity credit for employing individuals from one or more of nine targeted groups. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 1:52 pm
., The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1-44 (1960). [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
Robert Adell Children's Funded Trust, 701 N.W.2d 144, 150-51 (Mich. 2005)). [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Doe, 556 A.2d 1107, 1121-22 (Md. 1989); Doe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
at *1. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
Atlantic Richfield Co., 51 F.3d 1421, 1439 (9th Cir. 1995). [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Ritts, "Preemption and Medical Devices: A Response to Adler and Mann," 51 Food & Drug L.J. 1, 6 n.21 (1996).After Lohr came down, we thought those words had been relegated to the dustbin of legal history. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Well, an election happened, but: (1) we're not so crass as to think that any member of the Court, beyond being aware of election returns, changes his or her mind for that reason, and (2) the briefing in Levine was all completed under the prior Bush administration, so it's not like there was some abrupt change in the government's position during the course of the case.But beyond the election something else much more profound happened - large parts of the nation's economy… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Lord Neuberger gives five reasons: (1) the opening words of s 167(2) do not suggest that such an assessment is required. [read post]
