Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 2:00 am
The Court of Appeal disposed of the matter by setting aside the order of the lower court and granted that the insurance proceeds held by the Accountant of the Superior Court of Justice (along with interest) were rightfully payable to the Appellant. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:15 am
” Applying California law, the Superior Court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Craig Cox of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas granted the Motion to Consolidate. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:34 am
Thus, the limitation period continues to run until the court grants leave, giving rise to potential prescription of the Securities Act claims in the interim. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:41 am
In post-conviction proceedings, the Floyd Superior Court granted Cozart relief. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:18 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court relied on Edmond v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:49 pm
Superior Court and Brinkley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
And in Vance v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
A California Superior Court confirmed that Harris was right in 2013, and indeed Section 230 clearly prevents the prosecution. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:47 am
In a prior decision, another judge of Ontario Superior Court had granted judgment enforcing the award and ordered that the balance of the application be dealt with in a separate hearing. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 9:59 am
Singh et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:51 am
In Summers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Accordingly, the Court will, albeit reluctantly, grant injunctive relief as discussed above. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
(Able v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 7:44 am
In finding there was no genuine dispute of material fact, the court relied on Barry v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:53 pm
Rigby v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
Superior Court, 145 Cal. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
The court correctly granted an injunction because Harting had a potential interest in the property. [read post]
